
Background
to the Riley Roadster
Riley, under long serving chief engineer Harry Rush, had begun developing
their post-war range of cars in late 1943. Two "foreign" cars
that had been at the Coventry factory during 1938/39 had a considerable
influence on Rush and his small team responsible for the company's post-war
cars-the BMW 327 coupe and the Citroen Light 15. The BMW was admired
for its sleek styling, the Citroen for its torsion bar independent front
suspension, rack and pinion steering and general proportions.
Resources
were not available to develop a new family of engines and so Rush had
to be content with further development of the existing 1½-litre
and 2½-litre units. Although having origins dating back to the
1920's they were still superior in performance to virtually every other
British four-cylinder engine in 1945.
For the
2½-litre model the engine was a development of the pre-war "Big
Four" that was rated at 16 hp under the English system. With a
cylinder bore of 80.5mm and a crankshaft stroke of 120mm it had a capacity
of 2443cc. Its post-war redevelopment included driving the twin camshafts
by a duplex chain instead of gears and the adoption of twin SU carburettors
to raise output from 82 bhp to 90 bhp at 4,000 rpm. By the time the
Roadster became available in the summer of 1948 the power had risen
to 100 at 4,500 rpm using larger intake valves. Intriguingly, the 2½-litre
engine retained white metal bearings.
The Riley
1½-litre saloon appeared first, in August 1945, with the 2½-litre
saloon derivative following in July 1946 with availability from November
of that year.
Why
a Roadster?
With the need to export high on the agenda it was imperative that new
markets be found. As part of the huge Nuffield Organization, Riley was
aware of the export potential of convertibles because of the success
of the MG TC, particularly in America. The reasoning of Riley management
could have been if MG could succeed beyond all expectations with their
small, cramped and uncomfortable, underpowered TC sports car then if
they offered a larger and more powerful convertible they, too, should
enjoy considerable success. It was also noted from observations that
the several American automobile manufacturers did not offer buyers convertibles
so the Riley people within the Nuffield Export Organisation believed
that they could successfully sell to this untapped niche market with
something a little larger and far more comfortable than the MG TC.
According to British motoring historian Jon Pressnell in Classic and
Sportscar, August 1987:
Indeed,
the story goes that the Roadster had its origins in a sketch on the
back of an envelope brought back from the States by a member of the
sales force, the man claiming that this was the sort of car for which
the Americans were clamouring. It apparently transpired that the enthusiastic
salesman had only talked to around a third of the American dealers
So the
2½-litre Roadster began limited volume production. Interestingly
it was not called Roadster but rather a "Three Seater Tourer."
The basis
for the Roadster was the 2½-litre's sedan 119-inch wheelbase
chassis. The chassis had additional outriggers to suit the different
Roadster body mountings and the front suspension cradle was from the
Riley 1½-litre that had a lower ride height.
It was
the only Riley then with a bench front seat, allowing the driver to
sprawl out to allow for implausibly large testicles (They were nearly
all male owners) and grip the large steering wheel to avoid toppling
out when cornering because of the cut down doors. Speaking of doors,
the story goes that the front and rear sections of the body were first
mounted onto the chassis, then a craftsman would come and make a door
to fill the hole between these sections. This probably explains why
these doors vary in length from car to car.
The front
dampers were different from the saloon's; the rear semi-elliptic leaf
springs had only nine leaves instead of eleven in the saloon; a one-inch
shorter radiator was used; the fuel tank held 20 Imperial gallons (up
from 12.5 Imp gallons) and was mounted differently to the chassis; and
the bumper brackets were made of heavier metal to support the bumpers
that were set at 18-inches from the ground to meet American market requirements.
The steering
wheel diameter was reduced from 18" to 17" and the steering
column was offset to the driver's side to provide more room for three
people. This necessitated an additional steering box connected to the
original rack mechanism and altered the steering ratio so that three
turns were needed lock-to-lock instead of 21/2 turns. And for the first
time on a Riley there was a column gearshift to support the perceived
American taste for a bench front seat and three-abreast seating.
That Riley
was losing money on each Roadster produced is not surprising given the
unique nature of the car, especially the body. For reasons never divulged
the company chose to not use any panels from the 2½-litre saloon
in an effort to contain production costs. Every single body panel was
different and unique to the Roadster. If the body panels were unique
so, too, was the ash framework. The engine hood line was lower and the
traditional chromed radiator grille was cut down by two-inches from
that of the saloon. Additionally, the dashboard and firewall assembly
was mounted further back on the chassis necessitating a special pedal
assembly, longer cables for the hand controls, a different wiring harness
with longer cables and a longer pipe to the engine oil pressure gauge.
As well, the dashboard itself was wider and because the fuel tank was
so large the Roadster had a different fuel gauge with a switch to allow
different readings from the two sender units in the tank. In Riley litreature
this feature was called a "reserve level switch" but in fact
there was no reserve fuel capacity.
As
an aside, the boot lid and doors of the Roadsters were individually
"fitted" to their particular body and marked with the last
three digits of the body No. in wax crayon on the inside face before
being removed for separate spraying.
All these
changes probably resulted from a lack of planning time. Drawings and
the first hand-built body are believed to have been completed in less
than a month, in December 1947. The first running prototype was not
completed until March 1948, in time for General Manager Jack Tatlow
to drive it to the Geneva Motor Show where it was Riley's centre of
attraction.
Actual
production of the three-seater tourer began after the Geneva Show in
March 1948. For that year only 121 were built, and all were exported.
Riley advertising of the time showed a sketch of the Roadster driving
past an English mansion, the driver being on the left-hand side of the
car. A notation on their litreature informed prospective buyers that
the Roadster was "for Export only" and no price was quoted.
The Roadster
was not a sales success in America. Perhaps it was the advent of the
new Jaguar XK120, or the high pricing, but the Americans never warmed
to the Roadster and with its major market rejecting it out of hand the
decision was taken to withdraw it from production. On January 27, 1950,
the last Roadster rolled off the Abingdon line.
|

Roadster
at Le Mans
Riley
had traditionally been a marque involved in motor sport and with a measure
of success in the prewar years. Postwar the saloons were used in various
rallies across Europe but the Roadster was known to have been used in
only one major event-Le Mans 1950. A Roadster, registered number AEN
10, was entered by Geoff Beetson and co-driven by a Mr Lawrie. It covered
2,878 kilometres (1,799 miles) during the 24 hours at an average speed
of 74.22 mph, finished 17th out of 60 starters, took fourth place in
the 2,000-3,000cc class and placed 8th in the Rudge-Whitworth Cup.
As
James Taylor noted in his book Riley RM Series:Although the car's performance
in the race was creditable rather than outstanding, its placing gives
very little idea of its capabilities as compared with a standard car.
The
production Roadster, for example, could never be persuaded to touch
100 mph, whereas Beetson's car regularly reached that speed at three
points on the Le Mans circuit, and on some occasions touched 110 mph
at the same points.
That
110 mph corresponded to just over 5,000 rpm. Worth noting, too, is that
the fuel consumption for the whole race averaged 15.3 mpg, which compares
with around 20 mpg for a standard Roadster driven hard.
AEN
10 was raced in near-standard specification, modifications being limited
to some weight removal-bumpers, hubcaps, windshield replaced by an aero
screen, bench seat replaced by a single bucket seat, aluminium hood-and
the fitting of a close-ratio four-speed gearbox and 3.5:1 Healey rear
axle. Dunlop racing tyres and a carefully assembled and balanced engine
completed preparations.
|